The UK Was Totally Justified Detaining Greenwald's Partner
Saul Loeb/AFP
Greenwald explained his outrage in the Times:
"What’s amazing is this law, called the
Terrorism Act, gives them a right to detain and question you about your
activities with a terrorist organization or your possible involvement in
or knowledge of a terrorism plot,” Mr. Greenwald said. “The only thing
they were interested in was N.S.A. documents and what I was doing with
Laura Poitras. It’s a total abuse of the law.” He added: “This is
obviously a serious, radical escalation of what they are doing. He is my
partner. He is not even a journalist.”
What Greenwald fails to acknowledge is that, from the government's
perspective, exposing top secret surveillance methods used to prevent
terrorism is itself a threat to national security. Before letting a
civilian walk away with potentially critical security information, it
makes sense that the UK would detain him (maybe 9 hours wasn' t
necessary), search his belongings, and probably mirror his hard drives.Intelligence expert and National Security writer Joshua Foust described the UK terror law as "odious," but also said Greenwald used his husband as "authority-bait" and should have expected the detainment:
Regardless
of the rightness or wrongness of his decision to help pilfer and
distribute the treasured secrets of several governments, to do so
openly, with such braggadocio, is not only arrogant it is misguided.
This
is not a game, especially to the governments being exposed, and
casually involving a spouse to take a hit when he won’t risk it is a
bizarre and troubling decision ... it’s a bit difficult to see why anyone would be surprised that he would be at the very least questioned by British authorities.
No comments:
Post a Comment